The Federal 11th Circuit Rejects Hunstein But The Printer Liability Theory Is Not Dead

Weighing in at 83 pages, including separate majority, concurring and dissenting opinions, the decision was made.

Read More   

Ninth Circuit Hears First Appeal Attacking Nevada S.B. 248- The Medical Debt Collection Law

On July 1, 2021, medical collection activity stopped in Nevada because S.B. 248 became effective.

Read More   

Ninth Circuit Hears First Appeal Attacking Nevada S.B. 248- The Medical Debt Collection Law

On July 1, 2021, medical collection activity stopped in Nevada because S.B. 248 became effective.

Read More   

Really!! Court Rules “Obligation” In A Settlement Letter Is A Threat That A Consumer May Be Sued

Since the 7th Circuit released their 2014 McMahon decision, using the word “settle” or “settlement” in any settlement offer letter has exposed collection agencies to being sued. Finding an FDCPA violation, the McMahon Court ruled that the consumer could reasonably assume that “settle” was a legal term and consumers would fear being sued for the debt.

Read More   

Hunstein Copycat Claim Loses All 9 Lives: NJ State Trial Court Rules- Using A Printer Is Not An FDCPA Communication

Courts across the country have been required to deal with the tsunami of cases filed after the 11th Circuit’s industry changing order in Hunstein v. Preferred. While we all wait for the 11th Circuit to issue its new opinion, which is expected any day now, a New Jersey state court judge recently issued a stinging rebuke of the Hunstein theory.

Read More   

Be Careful What You Rely On: Washington Court Says Debt Collector’s Reasonable Reliance On Balance Amount From Creditor Not Enough To Avoid FDCPA Violation

In Creager v. Columbia Debt Recovery, a district court judge partially granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,concluding that the debt collector’s attempts to collect an unpaid apartment debt with an balance inflated because the plaintiff had forfeited her security deposit, violated the FDCPA. The information supplied by creditor/client did not protect the debt collector.

Read More   

Subscribe to the Sessions Newsfeed

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.